Young Gypsy girl loses 80% of her skin in hate crime.
The one thing I can’t stand about Europeans: Racism against Gypsy/Romas. Few europeans are actually so far-right that they would attack a child, but the moderate population still has strong prejudices. When you think about it, America is so far ahead when it comes to racism. Just from my expirience.
In eastern Slovakia many Roma live in segregated communities like the village of Ostrovany where municipal authorities spent some $16,000 to build a wall separating the Roma from their white neighbors, because of fears of “alleged Roma crime,” said Stanislav Daniel from ERRC.
link: Burned girl a symbol of Roma hate and hope
Have something to say about this post? Contact me.The Pros and Cons of Marijuanna Legalization this November
On November 2nd, you will hopefully be heading out to the polls to vote on the legalization and taxation of Marijuana in California.
I was looking through the initiative data and found interesting pros and cons.
Full legalization will lead people to consume marijuana without the advice or guidance of a medical professional, and that could be dangerous for a number of people. Kevin Reed, who owns the Bay Area Green Cross medical marijuana delivery service, says, “This ballot measure, which likens cannabis to alcohol or tobacco, instead of ibuprofen or aspirin, hurts patients.
I guess the obvious problem here is that even though Marijuana may help manage pain, it really isn’t just an aspirin. It would be good for everyone to be guided on not abusing it and being careful, but medical guidance doesn’t seem to help people who abuse vicodin or painkillers. Marijuana is a drug – like alcohol. I think it’s a fine comparison.
Marijuana is illegal under federal laws. If marijuana becomes legal in California under state law, it will still be federally illegal.
True, but they have to be out of their mind to pursue this. They didn’t pursue Prop 215 that harshly.
Estimated fiscal impact: Savings of up to several tens of millions of dollars annually to state and local governments on the costs of incarcerating and supervising certain marijuana offenders. Unknown but potentially major tax, fee, and benefit assessment revenues to state and local government related to the production and sale of marijuana products.
I do think the fiscal impact will be a great positive one. There has even been talk to create a “Hemp Valley” similar to Napa Valley. Imagine the tourist effect, on top of the taxation.
The Field Poll released survey results in April 2009 which indicated that 56% of Californians support legalizing marijuana.
A PPIC poll on marijuana legalization in mid-May showed a very close match-up in sentiment between support and opposition. There were demographic differences, however: 62% of Latinos oppose legalization, men favor legalization more than women, and support for legalization declines with age.
Interesting – why do Latinos oppose legalizing marijuana? Maybe someone can enlighten me on this point.
Full text of the act: Click Here
And obviously, I would vote Yes.
November 2nd. Be there!
Ps. Happy Bday Sebastian! This post fits you, lol.
Have something to say about this post? Contact me.George Bush joins Facebook
Better late than never, I guess. His page boasts over 60,000 fans already. He joined on June 2nd, 2010. And even though his PR person once said that the former president “would never tweet” for some reason, he’s also joined twitter.
Any why now, you might ask? Well, his memoir, “Decision Points” is coming out soon. Looks like he’s going to use social networking to increase the buzz around the book, which by the way, I think is aptly named.
I think this book tour might revitalize his image, considering how well Laura did with her book. But who knows..
Have something to say about this post? Contact me.Thank you BP
You’ve pretty much guaranteed the world is going to end in 2012.
“Telephone” .. The afghanistan remix
Interpretation of Telephone by Lady Gaga by US soldiers stationed in Afghanistan. Brilliant. Don’t ask, Don’t telephone.
Vote for Nobody!

The crappy truth about why poor smart kids don’t go to college: because they’re poor.
I don’t like to blame my failures in life on statistics or on my circumstances – but I would be an idiot to pretend that these things didn’t affect me. Your own intelligence and determination can only take you so far, the rest, I’ve found – is luck.
I imagine that there are other charts like this on the internet, and the numbers probably vary a bit. I chose this one because the data was plainly displayed and the source is reputable. If you have a high income, but bad scores in 8th grade math, or low income and great scores in 8th grade math, you have about the same chance of getting a bachelors degree (1 in 3). This is actually a pretty good chance, but high scores are rarer and rarer the poorer you get.
Now, back to me: I think I’m smart. On most standardized tests I always come out in the top 5% at least. I do really well on tests that measure problem solving, abstract thinking, creativity, logic, etc. I liked being smart. I took comfort in knowing that smart kids would one day rule the world.
I was in the low income bracket most of my life. My parents never saved for college for me. My parents are in their 50′s and still don’t own a home. I was raised with enough sense to know that I should not expect money in a situation like this.
I find it so silly that I tried to hide my poorness so desperately in high school. I remember coming back from Mock Trial and making the driver drop me off a couple streets away so they didn’t see that I lived in a rented condo. I tried so hard to pretend I was just like everyone else. (The truth is there were other kids in my school that were poor, they just hid it as well) In high school I had already realized the reality of the chart above, and I had given up. It was a stupid thing to do. I came up with excuses why I was “choosing” not to go to college when I wanted to go so badly. I just knew I couldn’t.
So where am I know? I can’t dwell on the past and I actually dislike bringing it up. But it’s important for me to look over that and see my mistakes. My circumstances influenced me a lot, and nobody ever showed me how to apply for college, but my negativity was inexcusable. That brings us to today.
What do poor kids need in this world to survive and succeed and surpass their parents income? Education – true education. College degrees are useful for getting jobs, but education is a priceless commodity. The way to bring education to low income kids is through technology. These kids, they will never have teachers of high enough quality or class sizes small enough that they can have a Socratic learning environment. No matter how much we picket and petition, public schools will NEVER match private and prep schools, because of the simple fact of class sizes, teacher motivation (they get paid better, they teach better – at least that’s my theory). The only way we can match them is to change the game around. A low income child may not get a teacher’s singular attention, but they will get Penny the Pen’s attention. Interactive game-like lessons that are the future in my opinion. Because computers are patient, and lessons will have a Pavlovian effect, the amount of information a child can learn rises exponentially. After all, children are just really super smart sponge-brain dogs. Kids can learn second languages in elementary school – heck, they can learn programming. Vocabularies could increase tenfold. They could learn finance and business skills. Just make learning into a game, because guess what, no matter how terrible and annoying and boring teachers are, REAL learning, has ALWAYS been fun for me! And every kid deserves that!
If you give a kid a book with fun math puzzles – he’ll learn some math and be interested. If you give a kid a computer with terabytes worth of information in a game-like setting, well, he’ll outpace almost all his classmates in one afternoon.
And guess what – this low income kid might still not get to go to college, but he’ll be smart, multi-lingual, and he will also be business savvy. This is the boss of the next century.
Have something to say about this post? Contact me.So what’s in the final healthcare bill that passed?
I don’t like making political posts alot, but the healthcare bill just passed, and I was really interested about what’s actually in it. I found a summary here and thought I’d share. Here’s a clean-cut summary of what’s in the final healthcare bill:
Coverage:
- Would expand coverage to 32 million Americans who are currently uninsured.
Health Insurance Exchanges:
- The uninsured and self-employed would be able to purchase insurance through state-based exchanges with subsidies available to individuals and families with income between the 133 percent and 400 percent of poverty level.
- Separate exchanges would be created for small businesses to purchase coverage — effective 2014.
- Funding available to states to establish exchanges within one year of enactment and until January 1, 2015.
Subsidies:
- Individuals and families who make between 100 percent – 400 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) and want to purchase their own health insurance on an exchange are eligible for subsidies. They cannot be eligible for Medicare, Medicaid and cannot be covered by an employer. Eligible buyers receive premium credits and there is a cap for how much they have to contribute to their premiums on a sliding scale.
Federal Poverty Level for family of four is $22,050
Paying for the Plan:
- Medicare Payroll tax on investment income — Starting in 2012, the Medicare Payroll Tax will be expanded to include unearned income. That will be a 3.8 percent tax on investment income for families making more than $250,000 per year ($200,000 for individuals).
- Excise Tax — Beginning in 2018, insurance companies will pay a 40 percent excise tax on so-called “Cadillac” high-end insurance plans worth over $27,500 for families ($10,200 for individuals). Dental and vision plans are exempt and will not be counted in the total cost of a family’s plan.
- Tanning Tax — 10 percent excise tax on indoor tanning services.
Medicare:
- Closes the Medicare prescription drug “donut hole” by 2020. Seniors who hit the donut hole by 2010 will receive a $250 rebate.
- Beginning in 2011, seniors in the gap will receive a 50 percent discount on brand name drugs. The bill also includes $500 billion in Medicare cuts over the next decade.
Medicaid:
- Expands Medicaid to include 133 percent of federal poverty level which is $29,327 for a family of four.
- Requires states to expand Medicaid to include childless adults starting in 2014.
- Federal Government pays 100 percent of costs for covering newly eligible individuals through 2016.
- Illegal immigrants are not eligible for Medicaid.
Insurance Reforms:
- Six months after enactment, insurance companies could no longer denying children coverage based on a preexisting condition.
- Starting in 2014, insurance companies cannot deny coverage to anyone with preexisting conditions.
- Insurance companies must allow children to stay on their parent’s insurance plans through age 26.
Abortion:
- The bill segregates private insurance premium funds from taxpayer funds. Individuals would have to pay for abortion coverage by making two separate payments, private funds would have to be kept in a separate account from federal and taxpayer funds.
- No health care plan would be required to offer abortion coverage. States could pass legislation choosing to opt out of offering abortion coverage through the exchange.
Individual Mandate:
- In 2014, everyone must purchase health insurance or face a $695 annual fine. There are some exceptions for low-income people.
Employer Mandate:
- Technically, there is no employer mandate. Employers with more than 50 employees must provide health insurance or pay a fine of $2000 per worker each year if any worker receives federal subsidies to purchase health insurance. Fines applied to entire number of employees minus some allowances.
Immigration:
- Illegal immigrants will not be allowed to buy health insurance in the exchanges — even if they pay completely with their own money.
[Source] for the above information. Also, Here’s a PDF of the budget information for the healthcare bill.
On a personal note, this means that I now get my insurance reinstated, as well as my brother, and also Dary has a good chance of getting insurance as well by 2014.
Have something to say about this post? Contact me.Youtube vs. Viacom: Grow up!
First off, you should know that I hate copyright fundies. Back in the earlier days of the internet, there were alot less graphic designers and such posting their crap on the internet. One of the more famous online designers discovered someone in New York selling prints of their graphic design work on posters, obviously without their permission. They raged all over the internet about it. The designer never intended to sell them on the street. So technically, they’re not losing any money, because they’re not even in the market. If anything, the street vendor in new york was making that designer’s work more famous and recognizable. It was like a moving billboard walking around New York.
This is where Youtube v. Viacom comes in:
People uploaded videos of their favorite songs. Also, people uploaded videos of their favorite songs with lyrics. (I’ve guessed that these lyric songs have been part of a marketing scheme for a while. I don’t know many people who are so bored out of their minds that they make a karaoke video by hand) Youtube claims they have proof that Viacom has been secretly uploading videos to promote their artists, then begged Youtube to take them down, then asked Youtube to put them up again, because they realized it was part of a marketing operation. I wonder if someone over at Viacom is either a nutjob or the marketing and legal departments are on opposite sides of the building. That would explain alot. Why walk all the way over to the other side of the building when you could sue somebody? Seems plausible.
When the songs were uploaded, Viacom’s traffic went up. I can’t verify the traffic came from Youtube alone, but I do have a nifty chart.
![VIA[1]](http://noemi.ro/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/VIA1.gif)
I know the justice system doesn’t work like this – but let’s look at it from an economic standpoint. This entire time Youtube has been making some paltry profits from videos. Viacom’s been reaping free marketing off Youtube, and tugging at them like a 5-year-old to put their videos down then up, and then begging to buy Youtube. They basically got a free marketing campaign out of this, which is hard to value. Viacom also made money from Youtube’s ContentID program which allows them to monetize their copyrighted work no matter who uploads it. Either way, everyone made money.
![220px-Ellen_DeGeneres-2009[1]](http://noemi.ro/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/220px-Ellen_DeGeneres-20091.jpg)
So what now?
A frivolous lawsuit really, because I think out of all the websites out there, Youtube really bends over backwards for copyright owners. And they really shoudn’t. Art, Music, Comedy – all of these things are free. Yes, you can monetize them, but you can’t own what they are. If I hear a joke on TV I can easily turn around and entertain a friend with that same joke – word for word.
My bottom line – I’m not anti-copyright ownership, I’m against it ruling our lives. It should be legal to ask things to be taken down – but it’s not a provider’s responsibility to screen all it’s content. I also think economic sense should be used – like the designer who’s work was being sold (and further made the designer famous), and Ellen who popularizes music to her fans being sued by record labels.
Have something to say about this post? Contact me.“If creativity is the field, copyright is the fence”.
John Oswald
While there is life, there is hope.
Cicero in Ad Atticum
Have something to say about this post? Contact me.![health-care-protest1[1]](http://noemi.ro/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/health-care-protest11.jpg)